Shabbat Parashat Vayakhel - 5784
Shabbat Parashat Vayakhel - 5784
Rabbi Hal Miller
And Moshe assembled the entire assembly of the children of Israel and said to them,
these are the things that God commanded to do them. [Shemot 35:1]
At the conclusion of the previous chapter, Moshe was speaking to the entire people. Why
would the Torah need to tell us in the very next verse that Moshe assembled the entire
assembly? Further, in 35:4 it tells us that Moshe spoke to the entire assembly, which is
what he was already doing. In 35:20, after Moshe completed his speech, we see that the
entire assembly left Moshe's presence, which indicates that before this they had remained.
Then in 35:30, Moshe again speaks to the people, but there is no indication that he called
them back in the mean time. Since the Torah does not waste words, there must be reasons
for each of these.
Rashi indicates that the Torah just did not tell us about a day here. Moshe came down the
mountain on Yom Kippur, dealt with the calf incident and the resultant deaths, then sent the
people back home until the next morning, where in our verse he begins fresh with mitzvot.
Rav Hirsch concurs about our verse occurring right after the calf, but without an additional day.
Instead, he sees it as an explanation that the people felt their action lost them the grace of
God, so Moshe here re-gathers them to God, meaning that in fact God still wishes for them
to have the Sanctuary. Rashbam says it was to collect the half shekel in order to build that.
Ramban understands this assembling as different from where things were. Only the men
were gathered to where Moshe came down, now the women and children were included. He
also follows Rashi about an additional day, explaining that Moshe took the time to make the
mask to cover the light shining from his face. He gives another alternative which is similar to
Rav Hirsch, that God was reconciled, gave them the second Tablets, and sealed a new
covenant so the people now reverted to their prior status and were being called back as before.
Malbim sees our verse as a demonstration of unity. Before the calf incident, the people were
all as one, but fell into discord and disunity over that calf. He cites the Yerushalmi that each
tribe even built its own calf. Now, Moshe brings them all back into one nation.
Rav Moshe Feinstein explains that the people were assembled for Moshe to give them the
commandment of Shabbat, teaching that the giving of mitzvot required the entire nation to
be present. He also notes that verse 20 about the people departing is to teach that any time
we come across a mitzvah we need to go accomplish it immediately. This approach also
explains verse 30, that Moshe is giving the commandments of construction to Betzalel.
Rav Yosef Soloveitchik has an entirely different approach, tied to the giving of the mitzvot
about Shabbat: "There are two types of transgressions, public and private. One who steals in
secret is punished more severely that one who robs openly because the latter is not
hypocritical about his ethics and does not fear human or God. The one who steals in secret
fears human more than God. The opposite applies to Shabbat, that one who is private about it
is not a heretic since that involves open denial of creation and God. The word community, adat,
also means witness. Moshe assembled everyone to charge them to act as witnesses about
keeping Shabbat."
Comments