Shabbat Parashat Shemini - 5783
Shabbat Parashat Shemini - 5783
Rabbi Hal Miller
God spoke to Aharon saying, "Do not drink intoxicating wine, you and your sons with
you, when you come to the Tent of Meeting that you not die, this is an eternal decree
for your generations." [Vayikra 10:8-9]
This parsha features many speakers to many listeners. The Torah gives names in
many cases, but it remains confusing unless we stop and pay attention. We could, of
course, begin at the beginning of Bereishit to track who is saying what to whom, but
will limit this discussion to Vayikra chapter 10. Immediately after the deaths of Nadav
and Avihu in verse 2, we have 3, "Moshe said to Aharon, of this did God speak saying"
so here it is Moshe speaking to Aharon, repeating what he had heard from God.
Leaving aside that the Torah does not recite such a conversation where God said this
to Moshe, we move to the next verse, where Moshe speaks to Mishael and Eltzafan.
In verse 6, Moshe turns back to his brother, "Moshe said to Aharon and to his sons
Elazar and Itamar", this time including Aharon's sons who were standing there even
in verse 3 although not addressed.
Then we have a switch. In our verses, it is God speaking directly to Aharon, or so it
seems. Ibn Ezra says that the Torah is merely simplifying things, and that God
actually spoke to Moshe, who then relayed it on to Aharon. It seems odd that Elazar
and Itamar are again ignored here, even though clearly the commandment is also
directed to them. This could be a proof for Ibn Ezra since up to this time God had
only been speaking with Moshe or with Moshe and Aharon together. If in fact God
spoke directly to Aharon, it would make sense that He did not include the remaining
sons directly, which would be a proof against Ibn Ezra. Most commentators understand
that God did speak to Aharon here, not just through Moshe.
Then in verse 12, Moshe is speaking to Aharon and the sons together. Finally, since
the chapter divisions were not done by Moshe nor by Jews, verse 11:1 can be included
here as if part of chapter 10, and we have "God spoke to Moshe and to Aharon to say to
them". Interestingly, Rashi here gives the Ibn Ezra argument from above, that God spoke
to Moshe to have him relay to Aharon.
How should we understand the back and forth? Are there patterns involved? Perhaps.
Verses 6 and 12, Moshe to Aharon, Elazar and Itamar, are all commandments for the
Kohanim for all generations to come. 3 is not a commandment, rather merely a consolation
of Aharon. 4 is a commandment for the moment only, not for the future.
The more difficult one is our verse, 8-9. Clearly, this is a commandment for now and for
future generations, as are 6 and 12, yet the speaker and listener are different from those
two verses. What distinguishes this verse that the Torah needed to make the changes?
Many alternative reasons are given for the deaths of Nadav and Avihu. One of the more
widespread is that they drank wine prior to performing their service. Although our verse
clearly is meant for Kohanim for all generations, perhaps God here comes to emphasize
that a mistake was made in the past, where the other verses are only forward-looking.
Our verse is meant as a correction as well as future command, the others were only the
future. This explanation gets around the Rashi/Ibn Ezra point of whether God spoke to
Aharon directly or through Moshe as it makes no difference to the point of the verses.
Comments