Shabbat Parashat Emor - 5782
Shabbat Parashat Emor - 5782
Rabbi Hal Miller
A carcass or a mauled animal he shall not eat, to become impure through it--I am God. [Vayikra 22:8] Our parsha to this point is about Kohanim and not becoming ritually impure. It continues with a discussion about the purity of offerings. Right in the middle comes our verse, which says that a Kohen is not allowed to eat neveilah or tereifah. But no Jew is allowed to eat these, so why do the Kohanim need a separate command?
Further, in 21:5, "They shall not make a bald spot on theirs heads and they shall
not shave the edge of their beard and in their flesh they shall not scratch a
scratch." We see it again in Devarim 14:1. Again, these are prohibited to all
Jews, so why do the Kohanim need here a separate command?
Rashi answers our second question that the command not to make a bald spot
for non-Kohanim only applies to between the eyes, as the text there states, but
that there is a gezeirah shavah, a link from 21:5 back teaching that just as it here
includes the head, so too there it includes the head. This leaves open the idea
that the Torah could have written the command in only one place, to include the
greater set of application, or could have written it twice without referring to the
Kohanim in particular.
On the first question, Rav Hirsch points at the bird sin offering, which is shechted
by melicha, which is not the normal way to shecht a sacrifice, and the Torah is
here telling us that this is a one-place exception to the prohibitions against eating
meat that is not butchered in the otherwise proper way. It only applies to Kohanim,
who are the only ones to eat that particular bird sacrifice.
Rashi and the Gemora in Chullin [100b] tell us that the Torah is here differentiating
between a tereifah animal (torn instead of shechted) and a non-kosher animal (such
as a pig). An otherwise-kosher animal that dies without shechting is forbidden to all
Jews due to impurity. Here we see that this does not apply to birds. Although non-
Kohanim are not allowed to eat them for other reasons, such a bird is permitted for
a Kohen in this situation and he will not become impure. Ramban adds that the
purpose for our verse is to add a consequence for a Kohen who eats a torn animal,
that he cannot go into the Temple to serve due to impurity, which does not apply to
other Jews.
Comments