Shabbos Parashas Noach - 5779
- Oct 10, 2018
- 2 min read
Shabbos Parashas Noach - 5779
Rabbi Hal Miller
Noach was a righteous man, perfect in his generations, Noach walked with God.
[Bereishis 6:9]
There are those who point at our verse, compare it to Bereishis [17:1], and say that this
is a condemnation of Noach. Many commentators discuss our verse with regard to the
meaning of "perfect in his generations", but not many delve into the last portion.
In [17:1], God speaks to Avram, saying "Walk before Me and be perfect." The wording
in both verses, translated here as 'perfect', is identical. Whether Noach arose all the
way to the level of Avraham is not the point. Clearly, the Torah indicated that there is a
comparison in the positive sense. But there are differences between "Noach walked with
God" and "Walk before Me". The first and most obvious, that one is a narration and the
other is speech, can be explained in context, and does not appear to have great meaning.
The other big one is tense. Rashi explains that our verse is in the past, and he brings
proofs to show when such construct might be past or might be future. The second verse
is a commandment to be performed in the (immediate) future. Does this difference have
meaning?
Ramban tells us that 17:1 means, "To walk in the path on which I shall instruct you", in
other words God is telling Avram to behave in the way He is about to teach. Our verse
refers to what Noach has already accomplished by action rather than behavior.
Radak says that our verse is proof that "Noach cleaved to his Creator", meaning
"his actions were designed to please his Creator." While dealing with actions, it
sounds also like a behavior pattern, which muddies the waters that Ramban swims in.
Kol Dodi writes that our "verse uses the Divine name Elokim, which generally refers to
God's attribute of justice. Noach walked with God because he saw that He was just and
always kept His word." Kol Dodi explains that Noach expected God to act in justice against
the generation, and was initially disappointed when the Flood was delayed, but he came to
understand that justice will be dealt out, but in God's own time. He notes that Avraham did
not need to come to that understanding, as the reward promised him did not even come in
his lifetime, but to his descendants, thus Avraham was able to accept God's will without
even seeing the end result.
Noach was 'perfect' in behavior and action, but he needed to see results. Avraham was
'perfect' in behavior and action, and took God's word that the results would come eventually.


Comments